DSpace Repository

Casein-Hydrolysate-Loaded W/O Emulsion Preparation as the Primary Emulsion of Double Emulsions: Effects of Varied Phase Fractions, Emulsifier Types, and Concentrations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Salum, Pelin
dc.contributor.author Ulubas, Cagla
dc.contributor.author Guven, Onur
dc.contributor.author Aydemir, Levent Yurdaer
dc.contributor.author Erbay, Zafer
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-03T09:00:43Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-03T09:00:43Z
dc.date.issued 2023-03
dc.identifier.citation Salum, P., Ulubaş, Ç., Güven, O., Aydemir, L. Y., & Erbay, Z. (2022). Casein-Hydrolysate-Loaded W/O Emulsion Preparation as the Primary Emulsion of Double Emulsions: Effects of Varied Phase Fractions, Emulsifier Types, and Concentrations. Colloids and Interfaces, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids7010001 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 2504-5377
dc.identifier.uri http://openacccess.atu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4224
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/colloids7010001
dc.description WOS indeksli yayınlar koleksiyonu. / WOS indexed publications collection. tr_TR
dc.description.abstract Stable primary emulsion formation in which different parameters such as viscosity and droplet size come into prominence for their characterization is a key factor in W/O/W emulsions. In this study, different emulsifiers (Crill (TM) 1, Crill (TM) 4, AMP, and PGPR) were studied to produce a casein-hydrolysate-loaded stable primary emulsion with lower viscosity and droplet size. Viscosity, electrical conductivity, particle size distribution, and emulsion stability were determined for three different dispersed phase ratios and three emulsifier concentrations. In 31 of the 36 examined emulsion systems, no electrical conductivity could be measured, indicating that appropriate emulsions were formed. While AMP-based emulsions showed non-Newtonian flow behaviors with high consistency coefficients, all PGPR-based emulsions and most of the Crill (TM)-1- and -4-based ones were Newtonian fluids with relatively low viscosities (65.7-274.7 cP). The PGPR-based emulsions were stable for at least 5 days and had D(90) values lower than 2 mu m, whereas Crill (TM)-1- and -4-based emulsions had phase separation after 24 h and had minimum D(90) values of 6.8 mu m. PGPR-based emulsions were found suitable and within PGPR-based emulsions, and the best formulation was determined by TOPSIS. Using 5% PGPR with a 25% dispersed phase ratio resulted in the highest relative closeness value. The results of this study showed that PGPR is a very effective emulsifier for stable casein-hydrolysate-loaded emulsion formations with low droplet size and viscosity. tr_TR
dc.language.iso en tr_TR
dc.publisher COLLOIDS AND INTERFACES / MDPI tr_TR
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2023;Volume: 7 Issue: 1
dc.subject double emulsion tr_TR
dc.subject W/O emulsion tr_TR
dc.subject emulsifier tr_TR
dc.subject encapsulation tr_TR
dc.title Casein-Hydrolysate-Loaded W/O Emulsion Preparation as the Primary Emulsion of Double Emulsions: Effects of Varied Phase Fractions, Emulsifier Types, and Concentrations tr_TR
dc.type Article tr_TR


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account