DSpace Repository

Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Acikkar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Sivrikaya, Osman
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-21T06:57:02Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-21T06:57:02Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Acikkar, M., & Sivrikaya, O. (2018). Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 26(5), 2541-2552. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1802-50 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0632
dc.identifier.issn 1303-6203
dc.identifier.uri http://openaccess.adanabtu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/592
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1802-50
dc.description WOS indeksli yayınlar koleksiyonu. / WOS indexed publications collection. TR Dizin indeksli yayınlar koleksiyonu. / TR Dizin indexed publications collection.
dc.description.abstract Gross calorific value (GCV) of coal was predicted by using as-received basis proximate analysis data. Two main objectives of the study were to develop prediction models for GCV using proximate analysis variables and to reveal the distinct predictors of GCV. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and artifcial neural network (ANN) (multilayer perceptron MLP, general regression neural network GRNN, and radial basis function neural network RBFNN) methods were applied to the developed 11 models created by different combinations of the predictor variables. By conducting 10fold cross-validation, the prediction accuracy of the models has been tested by using R-2, RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. In this study, for the first time in the literature, for a single dataset, maximum number of coal samples were utilized and GRNN and RBFNN methods were used in GCV prediction based on proximate analysis. The results showed that moisture and ash are the most discriminative predictors of GCV and the developed RBFNN-based models produce high performance for GCV prediction. Additionally, performances of the regression methods, from the best to the worst, were RBFNN, GRNN, MLP, and MLR. tr_TR
dc.language.iso en tr_TR
dc.publisher TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES / TUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY tr_TR
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2018;Volume: 26 Issue: 5
dc.subject Coal gross calorific value tr_TR
dc.subject regression
dc.subject multiple linear regression
dc.subject multilayer perceptron
dc.subject general regression neural network
dc.subject radial basis function neural network
dc.subject HIGHER HEATING VALUE
dc.subject VALUE GCV
dc.subject MODELS
dc.subject FUELS
dc.subject HHV
dc.subject Computer Science
dc.subject Artificial Intelligence
dc.subject Engineering
dc.subject Electrical & Electronic
dc.title Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks tr_TR
dc.type Article tr_TR


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account